LezloveVideo Group
Home
Login Member List
LezloveVideo Group   » General Discussions   » Hot or Not?   » The Dominatrix School for Girl...  
Welcome Guest ( Login )

The Dominatrix School for Girls
Author
Message
Posted 12/23/2016 10:04 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:42 AM
Posts: 13,362
I discovered this video ("The Dominatrix School for Girls") while browsing through Amazon.com a short while back, and because it was cheap ($12.99), I actually ordered a copy. I mean, it certainly LOOKS like a girl/girl video, what with a butchy-looking older woman on the cover shown in the company of several attractive, young, & scantily-clad girls, whom I assumed that she would be shown dominating.

The weird thing is, whomever is responsible for putting this one together didn't seem to have a CLUE what it was that they were making!

It all opens abruptly with several young women being inducted into this "dominatrix school" against their will. It's like they're joining the army or perhaps being booked into women's prison. The older women in charge definitely appear to be butchy-lesbian-dykes, but they NEVER show any physical interest for the young women now under their direction/control.

The casting is actually decent. The several older women all LOOK the part, and they even force the pretty younger girls to dress in short, skimpy outfits. But what's the point, if nothing's going to happen? Instead, we watch as the younger girls attempt an escape, get caught, and if they're punished for it we really don't witness any of it.

Later, the girls revolt AGAIN, this time successfully, attacking (and even killing) their always-angry instructors.

WHO was this video even made for? I mean, there are ZERO sex scenes, despite casting enough pretty girls & older women to have made a potentially very hot video. It's just really, really STUPID! The whole thing runs only half-an-hour - but what a WASTED half-an-hour of my life!

The director/writer is a guy named Thomas Brennan, and it's produced by Ewing Brown & Kate Bevington-Blodgett. The younger actresses in this one include: Nicole Sykes, Meryl Bush, Amanda Baker, Veronica Parks, Genelle Padilla, & Kristen Kelly. The older women (mistresses) were played by Nadja Hoyer Booth, Patti McMahon, Andrea Cohen, Joycelene Lew, & Melanie Mosley.

AVOID THIS ONE AT ALL COSTS! - (I'm fully certain that even Peter & humble opinion would both agree with me that this is complete crap!)

- seriously, who put up the money to produce this garbage?
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 12/23/2016 3:02 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 4:38 AM
Posts: 5,340

Another bitter disappointment from buying sight unseen.

Need a box of tissues, Anon, to dry your tears?

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 12/23/2016 3:25 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:42 AM
Posts: 13,362
Skyhawk wrote: "Another bitter disappointment from buying sight unseen."

Yes, Skyhawk, it was a truly HORRENDOUS video. But "a bitter disappointment?" Not really. You see, whenever I opt to purchase a lesbian-themed video from amazon.com, I kind of expect the worst. That's not to say that EVERY girl/girl video they sell is complete trash, but more often than not, they're pretty bad.

"Need a box of tissues, Anon, to dry your tears?

No, but I suppose that's sweet of you to ask (although entirely unnecessary, as I can assure you) - thank you for caring, though.

Seriously, WHY would anybody want to produce a video titled "Dominatrix School for Girls" - even hiring several pretty younger women and giving them skimpy outfits to wear, along with casting a group of somewhat butchy-looking, dominant older women - but then churn-out a complete piece of crap that's neither lesbian nor the least bit hot?

I mean, WHO was the target-audience here?

It was almost like watching a porn-video that's had all of its sex-scenes deleted - and who could possibly want to see that? But, for some reason, somebody made this thing!

- On the positive side, I WAS able to post a review, warning other potential buyers what a piece of garbage it is - so my job here is done!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 1/15/2017 12:41 PM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Yesterday @ 2:41 AM
Posts: 960

Oh Anon you ought to know better if you want school girls being dominated then this may do...

 

and if you want something harder ( yes a full "contact") then try this:

 

or this

 

school of surrender, stories from slave life and on consignment 3 respectively.....

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/15/2017 2:39 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:42 AM
Posts: 13,362
celandina wrote: "Oh Anon you ought to know better... if you want school girls being dominated then this may do... school of surrender, stories from slave life and on consignment 3 respectively..."

Lloyd A. Simandl and the folks at Bound Heat certainly appear to get it, celandina, as those photos you've posted make clear!

Granted, not everybody likes domination & submission scenes in their girl/girl encounters, but for those of us who DO, it's hard to beat Bound Heat!

The older lesbian women in Bound Heat productions are ALWAYS more dominant, decadent, and/or predatory, and they NEVER waste our time flaunting their own bodies instead of showing their desire for the beautiful younger women under their control! I LOVE the way the woman in the top pic has ordered the pretty schoolgirls to all "assume the position," face down & ass-up, allowing her to then leisurely squeeze those gorgeous behinds - whether the younger women wish it or not!

If there is a weakness with Lloyd A. Simandl videos, it's his actual lesbian sex-scenes, which don't always include a whole lot.

- I only wish that MORE mainstream lesbian video directors copied Lloyd's excellent sub/domme Bound Heat style/approach!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 1/15/2017 4:23 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/13/2018
Posts: 5,760

"Seriously, WHY would anybody want to produce a video titled "Dominatrix School for Girls" - even hiring several pretty younger women and giving them skimpy outfits to wear, along with casting a group of somewhat butchy-looking, dominant older women - but then churn-out a complete piece of crap that's neither lesbian nor the least bit hot?"

That is a tragedy and a travesty. I'm having a vision of you or me transported to that studio by whoever is bankrolling the operation and given complete artistic authority.

The first thing we would do is take half an hour to whip together a very simple script - it's not that hard.

Then we would instruct the girls to pay attention to roles we assign them and act as if they were really in that position.

So if she's supposed to be an 18 year old good girl, scared and uncertain about what she has gotten into, ACT that way. (Not too much though, this is porn, not drama; lay it on just a little thick to let viewers know we're all just having fun.)

If you're supposed to a horny old perv who lusts for sweet young bods, then savor those sweet young bods! (Especially the bottoms unless you want to get by you know who.)

Etc.

~~~~~~~~~~

Or Skyhook might get transported instead by mistake, ignore the outfits and concept, and just say "Make up a script or not girls I don't care, I just want to film the sex. It's called 'Dominatrix School?' Whatever."

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/16/2017 4:26 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 4:38 AM
Posts: 5,340
If you guys can't find what you want, you're not looking hard enough.
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/16/2017 5:48 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/13/2018
Posts: 5,760
Quote: If you guys can't find what you want, you're not looking hard enough.

That's great! Where is it?

"It" being g/g porn films that deliver what this one's title promises, but with the awareness of and sensitivity to what that means of a Lloyd Simandl, and the full and explicit sexual encounters we have come to expect since the golden age began a dozen years ago.

Authentic and erotic sex is what we hungered for before the golden age revolution. The dream described here is our post-revolutionary longing.

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/16/2017 11:55 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:42 AM
Posts: 13,362
Aristide wrote: "That is a tragedy and a travesty. I'm having a vision of you or me transported to that studio by whoever is bankrolling the operation and given complete artistic authority."

I honestly don't mind people investing their money in churning-out XXX-garbage-porn if they believe they can make a profit doing so - just be honest about it - and don't give it titles implying that it's quality lesbian erotica instead! There are plenty of consumers out there (e.g. Skyhawk) who will accept anything & everything, so DON'T try to lure in the rest of us with titles suggesting that you've made a serious effort when you have NOT!

"The first thing we would do is take half an hour to whip together a very simple script - it's not that hard."

Normally, I would agree with you, Aristide - it's the easiest thing in the world to do - but I'm beginning to believe that a LOT of the people who are working behind the camera at these girl/girl studios lack the basic intelligence (e.g. talent, creativity, & imagination) to come up with even a SIMPLE script, which is why they so often rely on convoluted, un-erotic storylines that go absolutely nowhere!

"Then we would instruct the girls to pay attention to roles we assign them and act as if they were really in that position."

I seriously believe that SOME actresses appearing in girl/girl videos get this - they understand what constitutes an erotic intro and they're more-than-willing to play the role assigned to them - but, very sadly, others either don't care or simply believe that ALL guys are only interested in viewing female orifices up close, and so they accept the direction of directors, writers, & producers who haven't got a clue.

"So if she's supposed to be an 18 year old good girl, scared and uncertain about what she has gotten into, ACT that way. (Not too much though, this is porn, not drama; lay it on just a little thick to let viewers know we're all just having fun.)"

Again, I believe that some actresses GET THIS, and will go the extra mile to make something really erotic & hot - but they need some help - and that means people behind-the-cameras who will give them something to work with, as opposed to just wanting to get the whole thing over with as quickly as possible!

"If you're supposed to a horny old perv who lusts for sweet young bods, then savor those sweet young bods! (Especially the bottoms unless you want to get by you know who.)"

I happen to know that "you know who" thinks it HUGELY IMPORTANT for the older/predatory/dominant lesbian in a scene to give some quality-attention to the gorgeous derriere of the pretty girl that she is seducing! And I FULLY AGREE with him on this point!

- Lloyd A. Simandl films are usually quite good regarding women paying lots of attention to the luscious rumps of the girls they happen to be playing with!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Showing page 1 of 1 - 9 messages found
« Next Oldest :: Next Newest »


Design & Architecture © 2004 SMG Video, Inc | Terms & Conditions | All rights reserved.