LezloveVideo Group
Home
Login Member List
LezloveVideo Group   » General Discussions   » Off-Topic   » The Presidency of Donald Trump  
Welcome Guest ( Login )

The Presidency of Donald Trump
Author
Message
Posted 10/11/2017 4:28 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
LovesWomenFrenching wrote: "Of course I have no physical evidence of Trump's guilt, but in 2016 I watched interviews with some of Trump's accusers and a few of them, including a woman in her mid 50s who said she was 20 years younger when he assaulted her, really rang true."

Bill Clinton's many accusers ALSO repeatedly said things that rang true, LovesWomenFrenching, but they were all IGNORED by the media, by law-enforcement, and even by Bill Clinton's own WIFE, who blamed "a vast, right-wing conspiracy" instead for the many women coming forth and accusing her husband of sexual harassment & even assault!

It wasn't until President Clinton got caught lying UNDER OATH in that sexual harassment investigation involving Paula Jones that he was finally forced to admit that her charges were true - but even then his own party insisted that it was no big deal, and that the Europeans were laughing at us for not looking the other way while our powerful men did whatever they wanted to with younger women who weren't their wives!

With Clinton, even proven sexual assault and illegally attempting to cover it up were considered no big deal - whereas with Donald Trump, all fabricated rumors are believed without question. Do you see the rank hypocrisy here?

"People don't stop to think that any woman who Trump might have assaulted when Donald was a businessman..."

So you're saying that since Donald Trump is a billionaire, and because he "might have" assaulted women while a businessman, we have to take all charges against him seriously - but if a Democratic Party governor running for president does any of these things, it's best we IGNORE them? Yeah, that makes perfect sense. I seem to remember one female liberal pundit actually saying on the air that she'd "go down" on Bill Clinton, just to thank him for keeping abortion legal!

"No woman in her right mind would have wanted to turn her life into a hell by going up against Trump by herself..."

Do you see what you're doing, LovesWomenFrenching? You're PROJECTING Hollywood-liberal activist & millionaire-donor Harvey Weinstein as being Donald Trump! The weird thing is, I don't see a slew of liberal Hollywood actresses (who supported Hillary) all coming forth right now and accusing Trump of doing anything inappropriate - even though Hollywood HATES Trump and LOVES Weinstein! You're simply projecting what you WISH would have happened!

"Certainly Anon, you and I will never really know, but the fact that an extremely wealthy and famous man like Trump would brag to a TV host that he can get away with grabbing women by the pussy doesn't strike me as just made-up talk..."

It sounds to me as if you are re-living the 2016 presidential campaign, LovesWomenFrenching - and trying to get the voters to go back in time and equate Trump's statements with the actions of Hollywood liberal-millionaire Harvey Weinstein - the problem is, the voters have already HEARD all of this, yet they STILL chose Trump over serial-criminal Hillary Clinton to be our nation's president!

"Yup if some incredible circumstance ever found Donald Trump under the influence of a genuine truth serum..."

Yeah, sure... a "truth serum" - Bill Clinton just says to KEEP THAT TRUTH SERUM AWAY FROM HIM - adding that he never had sex with that woman (Miss Lewinsky), and never asked anyone to lie about it - not a single time!

- I'm amazed at how many supporters of our sexual-predator president were OK with his behavior but remain outraged at the accusations against President Trump!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 10/11/2017 4:55 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
Sylvester wrote: "What no comment on Trump and his travel ban from countries who have no real gubment being upheld unanimously today at the Supreme Court."

That news doesn't exactly support the media's anti-Trump narrative that nothing this president has done has succeeded! But had the Supreme Court struck it down you can bet that this story would have made it to the TOP of the nightly newscasts!

"Oh yeah Sotomayor was the only one foolish enough to be quoted as being in the minority opinion. And here she advertised herself as a "wise latina" (her words) when Barry hired her for the job."

I'm so happy that Hillary isn't the one currently in charge of appointing new U.S. Supreme Court nominees, Sylvester - do you remember how, during the 2016 presidential campaign, she actually said she'd like to nominate Barack Obama to be a justice on our nation's highest court? What a nightmare THAT would have been!

"Another brilliant appointment by O'hammer. Way to go Scotus, showing sanity in face of suicidal domestic policy pushed by anarchists."

I'm just happy to see that the grown-ups are back in charge, Sylvester - at least at the U.S. Supreme Court!

- Hopefully, before he leaves office, President Trump can add at least two or three more justices to the bench!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 10/11/2017 7:43 AM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:37 AM
Posts: 817
Quote: Sylvester wrote: " What no comment on Trump and his travel ban from countries who have no real gubment being upheld unanimously today at the Supreme Court ." That news doesn't exactly support the med...

IF SAUDI ARABIA, THE COUNTRY WHERE BIN LADEN AND 15 9/11 TERRORISTS LEARNED TO HATE AMERICA ISN'T IN A TRAVEL BAN, THAT BAN IS A TRUMP FRAUD


Until the President adds Saudi Arabia to a travel ban, his whole travel ban idea has no credibility. The whole reason for creating travel bans is supposed to be to prevent people with terrorist intentions from entering the United States.

Just as police realize that a person with a history of violence is likely to become a re-offender and a threat to the public, the country that was the original home of most of the radical Islamic terrorists who murdered thousands on 9/11, and from which their boss, Osama Bin Laden also originated, is likely to be the nation whose people pose the biggest potential threat to Americans.

Since Osama Bin Laden was a Saudi Arabian national, and 15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists who he sent to murder almost 3,000 Americans, were also Saudi Arabians, SAUDI ARABIA HAS BEEN THE #1 SOURCE OF RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS WHO HAVE MURDERED AMERICANS.

And wealthy Saudi Arabians spend more money sponsoring terrorism around the world, than the people of any other nation do. Saudi Arabia is a radical Islamic country where people are not prosecuted for murdering those WHO DARE TO LEAVE THE MUSLIM RELIGION.

So guys, it COULDN'T BE MORE OBVIOUS that if the President is going to have any countries included in a travel ban, SAUDI ARABIA SHOULD BE AT THE VERY TOP OF THE LIST!

So, why does the President exclude Saudi Arabia from every travel ban that he puts together?

The SAD & PATHETIC ANSWER to that question is that the Trumps do business in Saudi Arabia and have been engaged in negotiations to undertake some huge projects there, like LUXURY HOTELS. Donald and the other Trumps simply don't want to endanger their negotiations for business deals in that country by insulting the delicate sensibilities of their Saudi hosts with the reality that due to Saudi Arabian nationals having murdered more Americans on 9/11 than radical Islamic terrorists from any other country ever have, for the sake of the safety of Americans, Saudi Arabia's people should be included in any travel ban.

It's really sick that, someday, rich Saudi Arabians who contribute money to sponsor terrorism around the world, may get the chance to enjoy stays at a Trump hotel in Saudi Arabia, while President Trump is more interested in avoiding insults to these kinds of people than he is in SAFEGUARDING THE SECURITY OF AMERICANS HERE AT HOME.

When the former speechwriter for President Reagan, conservative Peggy Noonan, recently said that Donald Trump lacks the moral authority to serve as President, another reason Ms Noonan could have given to support her statement, is that due to his personal greed, President Trump places his family's ability to conduct business deals with radical Muslims in Saudi Arabia, ABOVE THE SAFETY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

It's sad to have a President WHO'S BASICALLY A TRAITOR as proven by his willingness to put his business deals with radical Muslims above the safety of his own people. But as anyone who has been paying attention for the last 2 years should know, Trump only does what's good for Trump.

And Donald never has, and never will, MAKE ANY PERSONAL SACRIFICES FOR HIS COUNTRY, especially if such sacrifices WOULD REDUCE TRUMP ORGANIZATION PROFITS.

And BTW, Trump fans, when the President visited Saudi Arabia it was really depressing to see you guys praising the weapons deal that the President was offering to a radical Islamic nation where the murder of people who try to abandon the Islamic religion is OK.

I couldn't believe that you guys could criticize President Obama simply for not using the words "radical Islamic terrorism", though Obama killed a lot more radical Islamic terrorists than President Bush did, but then you guys turn around and praise President Trump for supplying modern weaponry to a radical Islamic country whose people fund terrorism all over the world.

If a President Hillary Clinton was giving Saudi Arabia the same soft gloves treatment and favoritism that President Trump is, while Hillary also had business interests in that country, you guys would all be screaming for her to be impeached. And you know you would.

But Trump can do the most offensive things, and just because it's Donald Trump doing them, that's fine with you, but you'd quickly attack any Democrat who took the same actions.

Well guys, here's one of the kinds of posts I mentioned yesterday that none of you can have a decent comeback for to try to defend your President, because as his behavior concerning Saudi Arabia proves, Trump is the kind of disgrace as America's leader whose behavior simply has no decent defense.
LovesWomenFrenching


"It is a rare thing indeed, to ever observe in nature, anything so beautiful, as the sight of 2 pretty women, with one engaged in slowly sucking on the tongue of the other."(mrb0775@gmail.com)

IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 10/11/2017 9:44 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
LovesWomenFrenching wrote: "Until the President adds Saudi Arabia to a travel ban, his whole travel ban idea has no credibility."

I'm just happy that he's done SOMETHING to limit Islamic travel into the United States, LovesWomenFrenching. Islam is a primitive, often-violent, & incredibly INTOLERANT religion for a people who are primitive, often-violent, & incredibly INTOLERANT! On that point we can both agree!

"...the country that was the original home of most of the radical Islamic terrorists who murdered thousands on 9/11"

For eight long years, America had a president who refused to even USE the words "radical Islamic terrorists" - remember how, in the immediate aftermath of the Orlando nightclub shooting our 44th-POTUS blamed anti-gay violence, completely ignoring the role that ISIS played in that young Islamic guy's murderous behavior?

"So, why does the President exclude Saudi Arabia from every travel ban that he puts together?"

Probably because the courts would shoot it down, the same way they shot-down his travel ban regarding anti-American Islamic nations like Iran, Syria, & Yemen. The liberal courts in America today treat Islam like an admired religious denomination that we need to befriend & respect. Trump is changing that!

"When the former speechwriter for President Reagan, conservative Peggy Noonan, recently said that Donald Trump lacks the moral authority to serve as President..."

You know, now that Donald Trump is our nation's president, I can't help but notice a change of tone in your posts, LovesWomenFrenching - you're actually moving further & further to the RIGHT - something you NEVER did back when Bush was president - but here you are, always praising Reagan's speechwriters, along with several Republican governors & U.S. Senators, and all-but-IGNORING those politicians who make up the modern Democratic Party!

And here I always suspected you of being a lifelong liberal, who might even move further to the socialist-left, along with the rest of the Democratic Party! But now I'm not so sure!

"It's sad to have a President WHO'S BASICALLY A TRAITOR..."

Not even the Democrats are saying that, which furthers my suspicions that you've completely broken with that party and their repeated failures of the past eight-years!

"Trump is the kind of disgrace as America's leader whose behavior simply has no decent defense."

Didn't I write that exact same statement about Barack Obama eight-years ago? - yes, I'm pretty sure I did - you're stealing my quotes now? Seriously?

- You keep on visiting those Republican web-sites, LovesWomenFrenching - I believe that it's beginning to do you some good!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 10/11/2017 10:14 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/19/2017
Posts: 8,361
Trump's travel ban UPHELD by the SUPREME COURT has nothing to do with singling out religions like Muslims practice, oh no it's aimed at countries like North Korea and Venezuela with no credible gubment and therefore would stuff anyone on a plane who may become a drag on society or a threat.

" Credible " gubment being the operative word. If someone has problems with Muslims or Saudi Arabia then may I suggest diversity counseling where one can learn to accept all regardless of color creed or religious affiliation.

As to the Southern border Nancy and Chuck were cackling cutting jokes about Trump after a sit down home cooked meal at the WH recently telling the Potus no wall funding as far as comprehensive immigration policy. Well maybe Donald didn't get the memo his latest 70 point plan not only includes the " wall " it includes points for higher education and what's brought to the table, not just being an " unaccompanied " minor like some MS-13 deadly violent gangs as Potus Numero 44 gladly welcomed in since he lives behind gated casas and lifetime armed to the teeth Secret Service protection. Do as they say not as they do dimocrats.

Like Ashley Judd who openly campaigned for Hilda called Trump a pig but had no bad news about Harvey W. until the NYT broke the casting couch earth shattering news this week.
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/11/2017 3:23 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:06 AM
Posts: 4,940
"Certainly Anon, you and I will never really know, but the fact that an extremely wealthy and famous man like Trump would brag to a TV host that he can get away with grabbing women by the pussy doesn't strike me as just made-up talk..."

It's just that...talk. No evidence that it really happened, no video, no hidden mics, but lots of fake victims coming forth.
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/11/2017 9:42 PM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:37 AM
Posts: 817
Quote: LovesWomenFrenching wrote: " Until the President adds Saudi Arabia to a travel ban, his whole travel ban idea has no credibility. " I'm just happy that he's done SOMETHING to limit Islamic travel i...

Yes, you must also be happy that your President does business deals in a country where someone can be murdered for converting from Islam to Christianity, and under the Sharia Law that's in effect in Saudi Arabia, the murderer won't suffer any punishment.

And Anon, it's amazing that you can be so lame that as a defense for Trump's omitting from a travel ban the country that's been the greatest source of radical Islamic terrorist murderers of Americans, you actually resort to the idiotic and weak conservative talking point that "President Obama refused to even USE the words "radical Islamic terrorists"

Using that tired talking point has always made conservatives look like unthinking idiots, because actions speak louder than words. And President Obama's actions were killing more radical Islamic Terrorists than George W Bush did, including Obama nailing Osama Bin Laden. In fact, President Obama was so aggressive in nailing Muslim terrorists around the world, through the use of drone strikes, and other means, that Amnesty International, and another human rights organization thought that war crimes charges should be considered for Obama.

I don't care if Obama called radical Muslim terrorists "Pink Fairies", because he was a lot more effective at getting rid of the creeps than Bush was. But you guys will never get tired of making your stupid point about what exact name Obama called those people before he had them blown away.

And I'm sure glad that, unlike the Trumps, the Obama family wasn't profiting from doing business in the radical Islamic country where most of the 9/11 mass murderers originated.

Also, your excuse that Trump did not include Saudi Arabia in a travel ban because of resistance from the courts, is nonsense, and you know it. Because obviously, Saudi Arabia should have been the 1st country chosen for Trump's original travel ban, which was before the President even knew that the courts would put serious obstacles in the way of a travel ban. But President Trump NEVER EVEN TRIED TO INCLUDE SAUDI ARABIA IN ANY TRAVEL BAN. Because of his business interests he always wanted to avoid the insult to business partners inside Saudi Arabia that a travel ban on the country's people would cause.

And the kinds of schools in which the 15 Saudi terrorists of 9/11 learned, as children, to hate the infidel (which is any non-Muslim person) still operate and teach Saudi children to hate people like you and me. So the Trumps, by using that radical Muslim country to make money, really dishonor the memory of the almost 3,000 Americans who were murdered by radical Islamic Saudi Arabians.

Donald, and his children, who operate the Trump business empire, really can't be good Americans when they know that they are making money doing business in a country where it's legal to murder people for abandoning the Islamic religion. Basically, in Saudi Arabia the rich and the powerful use Sharia Law to terrorize the people into honoring Islam.

So by doing business in that country, the Trumps are literally making money by doing business with radical Islamic terrorists. Any survivors of Americans murdered on 9/11 must be truly sickened by the realization that the Trumps have business arrangements with Saudis who are likely to be very similar to the Saudis who murdered their loved ones, because many Saudi business people believe it's not wrong to kill the infidel.

Concerning me moving to the right because of things like mentions of Peggy Noonan. Ms Noonan is a true conservative, who, nevertheless, I've always liked for her honest and ethical way of conducting herself. I appreciate that in political discussions, unlike many conservatives, Peggy Noonan never seems to misrepresent the positions of liberals.

It's just too bad that we have a President who possesses absolutely none of Ms Noonan's honest or ethical approach to living.

And concerning me calling Trump a traitor, I believe that in the sense that, to me, Trump puts his personal profit ahead of the well being of the country, which actually is a betrayal, even if that can't result in legal charges against the President, like when someone sells military secrets to an enemy power, like Russia. But I'm not in politics, so I take no risk using strong language that a political office holder would probably shy away from, even while feeling as I do.

And you just claimed that 8 years ago people were saying Obama was a disgrace, who had no decent defense. You must be referring to some of the ultra conservative voices that I also heard at the time, that belonged to racists like Rush Limbaugh.

But Doris Kearns Goodwin, who may well be the most respected Presidential historian in the country,(and is also non-political) when recently providing a summation of Obama's 8 years, stated that he was a President who always conducted himself with dignity and grace. And those are 2 words that even his supporters wouldn't use to describe Donald Trump. (Especially lately, with Trump acting like a child on a playground engaged in name calling, by Donald referring to Senator Corker as liddle'Bob Corker.)

And certainly, President Obama was not the kind of man to ever publicly humiliate a member of his government, as was done for 10 days straight to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, by the totally classless character who now soils the Oval Office with his chubby body.
LovesWomenFrenching


"It is a rare thing indeed, to ever observe in nature, anything so beautiful, as the sight of 2 pretty women, with one engaged in slowly sucking on the tongue of the other."(mrb0775@gmail.com)

IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 10/11/2017 10:10 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/19/2017
Posts: 8,361
Imagine a Potus who takes selfies with other female dignitaries at Mandela's funeral while his wife is seething, imagine a Potus who gives billions to a terror state enemy like Iran, who allows MS-13 to cross the border on a welcome mat who doubles the debt with a weak 8 yr economy and one can dismiss a dimocrat hack like Doris Kearns Goodwin for looking away like a Harvey Weinstein blind eye by Obama.

Attachments:

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

  
Flirting-with-Danger.jpgharvey-weinstein-obama.jpg  
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/12/2017 5:39 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
LovesWomenFrenching wrote: "And you just claimed that 8 years ago people were saying Obama was a disgrace, who had no decent defense."

President Obama represented the kind of Democratic Party that would applaud an anti-law-enforcement hate-group that also hated the United States (e.g. #BlackLivesMatter) - and Barack & Michelle are exactly the kind of White House couple who (if Obama was still president) would show-up on the sideline of a Bears-Redskins game and kneel down with the players during the national anthem to show their solidarity.

Trump has a far better understanding for what the American people want to see in their president - even though YOU, LovesWomenFrenching, pretty-much hate everything that he says & does - Trump won because the modern-day Democratic Party no longer represents the American heartland or the blue-collar middle class that makes our nation so powerful & free.

I found the following column by Charles Gasparino in the New York Post:

The NFL just admitted Trump knows the fans better than it does

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is on the verge of handing President Trump a significant political victory by calling on his players to stand for the national anthem.

For the first time since some players began taking a knee in protest of police misconduct, the commish officially and explicitly said he wants players to honor the anthem by standing — even as he respects their right to protest. He says the league will come up with a formal policy at next week’s owners meeting.

The question is: Why did the league finally cave?

The answer: Follow the money.

Trump is a rookie politician who makes rookie mistakes: He’s often impetuous and volatile, and those traits have certainly hurt passage of his broader agenda.

But the reason why he created one of the greatest brand names in the world — one he leveraged to become president — is that he has incredible marketing instincts. And he knows political correctness doesn’t sell to everyone.

With that, the NFL’s one-knee controversy, which was all but ignored by NFL brass before the president got involved, was an easy pick-six down the sideline for The Donald, who gleefully and expertly took advantage and scored some much-needed political points in the process.

The kneeling trend began last year by former 49ers QB Colin Kaerpernick as a protest against what he viewed as rampant police brutality against minorities. Initially, Goodell appeared to praise it as a way to move “from protests to progress,” but fans often booed what they saw as abject disrespect of a patriotic symbol.

(Goodell’s spokesman Joe Lockhart claims his boss has “always said he believes players should stand for the anthem.”)

Put aside the merits of Kaepernick’s blanket condemnation of the police; being PC can backfire on your bottom line. This is particularly true in the business of football, where the league and its teams make so much money leveraging the game to sell shirts, soft drinks, beer and a lot more mainly through TV advertising by appealing to a certain segment of the population: mostly male, largely white and middle class.

The league’s data, according to a source, show that around 70 percent of all NFL viewers make $100,000 a year or less. NFL viewers are nearly 70 percent white and mostly male. The typical viewer is also more likely to have served in the military than the general population.

In other words, welcome to Trump Country.

Trump knew this from the minute he started his stand for the anthem crusade a couple of weeks ago when he called the kneeling players SOBs at a political rally and then called on owners to throw the alleged SOBs off the field.

To be sure, much of the political cognoscenti thought Trump’s comments were rash throwaway lines — a little red meat to his base that wouldn’t amount to much more when all was said and done. Why, they wondered, would the NFL care what he said about players? No one knows how the typical football fan feels better than Roger Goodell & Co., right? Wrong.

Trump, ever the savvy marketer, does. In the aftermath of Trump’s comments, as his approval numbers rose (particularly among his base), the NFL’s numbers went down.

League numbers-crunchers combed through the data and discovered that despite some ratings improvements in recent weeks, game viewership is still way off compared to last year. Even worse, I am told, the league believes the social-media boycott by NFL viewers, angered by the disrespect they feel was not only directed at the flag and anthem but tacitly approved by the league, has the potential to grow exponentially if the NFL doesn’t make this issue go away.

As one NFL marketing executive told me: “All the data show that football fans are tired of being inundated with politics in a place they would like a reprieve from politics.”

Trump knew all this intuitively weeks before the NFL genius quants had any idea what was going on, and he outwitted some of the smartest people in the business.

He couldn’t have done this, though, without Roger Goodell, a good businessman with a PC blind spot. Example: The Dallas Cowboys wanted to honor five cops who were killed by a racist madman with decals on their uniforms. The NFL said no — it violated a decal policy.

Policy or not, what Goodell missed was a clear trend of stories that looked like his league was run by social-justice warriors. The fans, however, noticed — and so did the president.


- THIS is why Trump is president, and why he's going to be re-elected, LovesWomenFrenching - and none of Harvey Weinstein's money going to Democrats will change that!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 10/12/2017 7:00 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 8:57 AM
Posts: 2,206
Quote: LovesWomenFrenching wrote: " And you just claimed that 8 years ago people were saying Obama was a disgrace, who had no decent defense. " President Obama represented the kind of Democratic Party that ...

Could anyone provide a list of companies that sponsor the NFL?...I just emailed Pepsi with my intention to boycott their products...the NFL needs to be taught a lesson...and the wallet is the best place to start..,

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Showing page 119 of 127 - 1262 messages found « First Page Prev Page Next Page Last Page »
« Next Oldest :: Next Newest »


Design & Architecture © 2004 SMG Video, Inc | Terms & Conditions | All rights reserved.