LezloveVideo Group
Home
Login Member List
LezloveVideo Group   » General Discussions   » Off-Topic   » VENEZUELA - socialism at work!  
Welcome Guest ( Login )

VENEZUELA - socialism at work!
Author
Message
Posted 8/1/2016 7:49 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
I love the way that socialists here in America always bring up the Scandinavian nations (with their tiny economies) as proof that socialism can actually work, when we see time & time again in countries like those of the former Soviet-bloc, Africa (where all of those one-party African socialist-states all existed throughout the 60's, 70's, & 80's), modern Cuba, the DPRK (aka: that oppressive hell-hole also known to the world as 'North Korea'), and those newly struggling socialist-economies of southern Europe (Greece, Italy, & Spain, etc.) what a DISASTER socialism inflicts upon the people of a nation!

Currently, oil-rich Venezuela is GREATLY suffering from the debacle of a socialist economic system inflicted upon that once prosperous nation by their very-own-Fidel-Castro-wannabee: Hugo Chavez.

This following column was written by Darío Paya, the former Chilean ambassador to the Organization of American States:

Long Lines and Empty Shelves

Venezuela drives the socialist bus off a cliff.


Back when I was 8 years old, my days would usually begin with my mom telling me to go stand in line at the small neighborhood shop. The line would have been there since before dawn, long before the shop would open, if it opened at all, because they had so little to sell. This was Chile in the early ’70s, under Salvador Allende's socialist government.

The recent images from Venezuela—of empty store shelves and desperate Venezuelans crossing the border with Colombia in hopes of buying something, anything, to eat—brought back those memories. As I did back in the '70s, people in Venezuela now regularly line up at shops with shuttered windows and locked doors. It's not that people lack money. There's always plenty of that during hyperinflation. It's just the scraps of paper aren't worth much of anything, which is why there's nothing to trade it for. Still, you wait in line because there are always rumors, hope against hope, that something will come in that day—maybe a little sugar, a pack of cigarettes, a can of whatever. And then things would get suddenly tense.

Which is how my mom got beat up.

When the rumor was of chickens—or maybe I should just say "birds," as the scrawny things were no larger than my 8-year-old hand—the stakes were higher than usual, and higher still if there were actually a few birds. One such day, Mom got to the front of the line just as the store owner was down to the last couple of chickens. He was as hungry as the rest of us and was about to be cleaned out. He asked my mom, "Could you take one for my family?" By agreeing to help the storekeeper—himself a capitalist pig, no doubt—my mother became an "accomplice" deserving of swift "popular justice." She was beaten on the sidewalk outside the shop by the local Committee of Supply and Prices, basically neighbors who had become the thuggish street-level enforcers of the socialist revolution. Her bruises were far bigger than the bird we never got to eat.

Please take a moment to guess who handles the distribution of food in Venezuela today: the local committees of the United Socialist party.

Hugo Chávez may be dead, but the disaster he set in motion is still very much alive. Several years ago, back when Chávez was still busy turning Venezuela into Zimbabwe, I asked a friend what he expected for his country once Hugo left power. "El chavismo is like a 70-year-old bus with loose steering, failing brakes, and no suspension, hurtling down a mountain road with cliffs on both sides and no guard rails," he said. "After Chávez, the next driver may or may not be another madman, but it will still be the same bus hurtling down the same road." And now, with Chávez's chosen successor, Nicolás Maduro, steering, the wheels are coming off the bus.

Populists and socialists destroy their societies in predictable ways. It's not like one day a populist gets up and says, "I'm going to ruin this country." Rather, he starts out wanting to spread the wealth and finds that the easiest way to hand out cash is by simply printing lots of it. Which creates a new problem: As the currency weakens, prices rise. But the populist finds there's an answer for that too. If bread is getting expensive, he can fix its price, and he gets to vilify the baker as a greedy capitalist.

But then the baker stops producing bread because he can't afford to make it, what with the rising price of flour. And so what does the populist do next? He fixes the prices of flour. When that doesn't work, the politically expedient thing to do will be to take over the bakery and the farms and hand them to the folks in the party's local committees, who prove to be rather less apt at farming and baking than they are at mother-beating.

Maduro is well down this path, having in the last months threatened to seize, among many other businesses, breweries that have shut down because they can't get barley. Capitalists who would stop making beer are just trying "to sabotage the country [and] should get out," Maduro railed this spring. In the same breath, he proclaimed that those who do try to get out "must be handcuffed and sent to the PGV," Venezuela's General Penitentiary.

None of this chaos is necessarily a problem for the populist politician. Because when food and other essential items—just try to get your hands on toilet paper in Venezuela these days—become really scarce, the power of the government's local committees grows. They, after all, have a monopoly on the distribution of food and necessities.

And if violence does erupt, it can be denounced as the doing of enemies of the state and used as a pretext for renewed crackdowns: "We're going to tell the imperialism and the international right that the people are present, with their farm instruments in one hand and a gun in the other," Maduro told a Caracas crowd. And soon, Mr. Populist finds himself with a good reason to suspend the country's constitution. Thus does a tyrannical attitude toward the shop-owner selling bread lead to a tyranny over a whole nation.

And for what? Back in the '70s when I was a kid waiting in line, most socialists actually believed that the shortages and hardships were just a way-station on the path to the promised land of socialism. Food shortages weren't the disastrous endgame of collectivist economics but just a difficult stage, they thought, on the progress to the new state-run nirvana. Of course, back then, there was the Soviet Union with money to keep its socialist clients from total collapse. Latin America's leftists felt themselves part of a bloc in a divided world. They had a religion of sorts and plenty of Cuban "revolutionary clergy" to spread its gospel.

But the current madness in Venezuela? Where does it lead? On the other side of this unhinged irresponsibility, there's nothing but a failed state.

One would hope this Chávez-instigated, Castro-advised, Kirchner-supported tragedy will have a sobering effect on the people of the region who might otherwise think that a failed state is something that only happens in distant African or Middle-Eastern countries. Because the toxic combo of populism, Marxist rhetoric, and weak institutions is all too prevalent in Latin America, a lurking challenge to freedom and the rule of law.

And we need to get Latin America permanently off that bus.


Even in Norway & Sweden, socialism STRANGLES economic growth & initiative! That's happened everywhere it's ever been implemented as an economic system!

- it is "the politics of envy" at work!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 8/2/2016 9:01 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:37 AM
Posts: 6,936
Quote: I love the way that socialists here in America always bring up the Scandinavian nations ( with their tiny economies ) as proof that socialism can actually work, when we see time & time again in countr...

Margaret Thatcher said it best with regard to socialism:

'The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of spending other peoples' money." -Margaret Thatcher

IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 8/7/2016 2:26 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 8/9/2017
Posts: 500
It was a dictatorship with an oil economy. The price of oil dropped and wiped out everything. The same happens here with any one-industry area, such as Detroit. We don't have the dictatorship yet but we're working on that.
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 8/7/2016 4:44 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
Lezfriend wrote: "Margaret Thatcher said it best with regard to socialism: 'The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of spending other peoples' money.' -Margaret Thatcher"

Margaret Thatcher got it exactly right!

Charn wrote: "It was a dictatorship with an oil economy. The price of oil dropped and wiped out everything."

Texas ALSO has an oil-based economy, and yet it remains a fairly prosperous state even when the price of oil drops.

"The same happens here with any one-industry area, such as Detroit. We don't have the dictatorship yet but we're working on that."

The difference between Texas and Detroit is that Texas is now a conservative RED state that believes in free-market solutions, whereas for the past fifty-years Detroit has been run into the ground by Democrats who believe in "democratic-socialist" solutions - WHICH DON'T WORK! The city of Detroit has become an American hell-hole with high-poverty, high unemployment, and an entitlement-based economy (with which the Democrats expect to keep themselves in power!)

But even in Detroit, you don't see people running into Canada to purchase food, whereas in Venezuela (where there is none) people really are crossing the border into neighboring Colombia to buy basic foodstuffs, which their own socialist government can no longer provide!

- also, in Detroit nobody is as yet killing the zoo animals for food!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 8/7/2016 8:10 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/19/2017
Posts: 8,361
Quote: It was a dictatorship with an oil economy. The price of oil dropped and wiped out everything. The same happens here with any one-industry area, such as Detroit. We don't have the dictatorship yet but ...

When a POTUS ships 400 milllion on pallets in an unmarked plane in the dead of night and the opposition in Congress raises not one objection and this same POTUS floods the country with illegal immigration and refugees from war torn Isis infested countries then lad, we're not " close to a dictatorship " the ship has docked ...

Attachments:

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

 
american_girl.gifiran4e-1-web.jpgtumblr_inline_myxl4oy8k61qmnw3x.jpg 

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 8/8/2016 8:06 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/19/2017
Posts: 8,361
Comey letting Clinton off the hook and Obama telling the idiot public " We sent Iran cash because we don't have a banking relationship with them " is ALL you need to know about the direction of gubment and it's proximity to a " dictatorship " senor.

Attachments:

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

 
16xo51.jpgPresident-Obama-golfing.jpgThe-Treasure-of-the-Sierra-Madre-bedoya-quotes.gif 
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 8/14/2016 7:58 AM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 7:23 AM
Posts: 1,578
Quote: Margaret Thatcher said it best with regard to socialism:'The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of spending other peoples' money." -Margaret Thatcher

The conservatives/right wing are good at phrases and they do like to talk about meritocracy, minimum state, freedom. Did Thatcher really reduce the state? Did Reagan reduce the State? or did they just change the focus of the State and just changed the taxes payers? socialialists and conservatives are all first and foremost, believers of the political system and they do believe that they need the State as coercion instrument to impose their ideologies (talk about freedom, huh?), so honestly don't see much difference between them.

As for Venezuela, I follow this closely, and I will say, to sum up. that it's the worst combination of two elements that inevitably destroy any economic system: nationalism and Keynesianism ("modern" socialism).

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 8/14/2016 9:46 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 2 days ago @ 5:59 PM
Posts: 3,387
Quote: The conservatives/right wing are good at phrases and they do like to talk about meritocracy, minimum state, freedom. Did Thatcher really reduce the state? Did Reagan reduce the State? or did they ju...

Very true.
lesofilos
==========================

The average (while active) porn star's sexuality defined: "Although youre bisexual, you've said you take relationships with men more seriously. Does this have anything to do with why you dont film girl/boy sex scenes?"

Charlie Laine: "Im more emotionally attracted to men and more physically attracted to women. I attach myself to men." on quote. Of course most girls return to hard heterosexuality after porn. Who me? I must have been...

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 8/18/2016 8:38 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 9:42 AM
Posts: 12,973
Canon wrote: "The conservatives/right wing are good at phrases and they do like to talk about meritocracy, minimum state, freedom. Did Thatcher really reduce the state? Did Reagan reduce the State?"

Reagan never promised to "reduce the state," but he really DID give a huge boost to the American economy by returning money to the people while ending many of the "tax and spend" bigger-government policies so favored by Democrats (e.g. Obama's so-called "Affordable Health Care Act" - which we all now know to be a huge expensive failure.) And Margaret Thatcher really DID put the brakes on the failed British policies of "nationalization," so encouraged by liberals everywhere!

"As for Venezuela, I follow this closely, and I will say, to sum up. that it's the worst combination of two elements that inevitably destroy any economic system: nationalism and Keynesianism ("modern" socialism)."

Hugo Chavez promised the exact same crap regularly promised by modern politicians throughout the U.S. Democratic Party, from Obama to Hillary Clinton & Bernie Sanders! Democrats "buy" votes by promising to take money AWAY from the "evil one-percent" and then re-distributing it to the remaining 99% (except that it doesn't ever actually happen). Black Americans overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama, only they're worse off today than they were when Bush was president, because they believed Obama's socialist bullsh*t.

Venezuela should be a prosperous, WEALTHY South American nation, but they believed Hugo Chavez and his socialist bullsh*t, and now they've got a collapsing economy, and those Venezuelans living near the border have to travel into neighboring Colombia or Brazil simply to purchase basic foodstuffs! Those who don't live near the border are reduced to going through the garbage. Venezuela's socialists have turned paradise into a modern-day hell-hole (just as happened in Cuba and North Korea)! And yes, it could even happen here!

- Socialism strangles economic growth everywhere and anywhere it's ever been tried!
IP Logged
This member is online.
Posted 8/22/2016 7:44 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 10/19/2017
Posts: 8,361
A Fort Worth FEDERAL Judge today ordered an injunction = ( stop for those down under ) Obama school bathroom edicts across the country that allowed someone to use the bathroom lockeroom of there choosing or non compliance meant federal education funds would be withheld.

The further slide into a gubment ruled by one with " commands " coming down to the peasants was given a slap down today in a Texas federal court thus delaying the Caracas imitation coming from the " progressives ". Lesofilos didn't like the Chamberlain comparison, the Chavez parallel might ruin his lunch.


Attachments:

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

  
chavezcastro_pic.jpgobama-chavez1.jpg  
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Showing page 1 of 3 - 22 messages found Next Page Last Page »
« Next Oldest :: Next Newest »


Design & Architecture © 2004 SMG Video, Inc | Terms & Conditions | All rights reserved.