LezloveVideo Group
Home
Login Member List
LezloveVideo Group   » General Discussions   » New Releases   » Make Her Submit 03  
Welcome Guest ( Login )

Make Her Submit 03
Author
Message
Posted 12/31/2017 10:26 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 6:59 AM
Posts: 13,498
Make Her Submit 03 - (Team Skeet)

As I am not all that familiar with Team Skeet, my expectations for this video were NOT very high to begin with, and therefore I was NOT particularly disappointed with this DVD. After all, when the so-called "quality" production-houses (e.g. Sweetheart Video, Girlsway, & Girlfriends Films) all put such a low-priority on imaginative, creative direction & writing, you can hardly expect Team Skeet to do otherwise, can you?

The set-ups for this one were mostly weak, and the sex scenes not all that impressive. For example, all four scenes included mechanical, formulaic INSTANT ANALINGUS, which is my definition for when a woman completely IGNORES the beautiful derriere of a pretty girl so that she can instead concentrate entirely on sticking her tongue up her ass-crack. It is both lame and un-erotic, and a clear sign of a weak director behind the camera!

1) Ellena Woods & Nina North - It all begins with pretty-girl Ellena inviting pretty-girl Nina over to her southern California home to share her swimming pool. Apparently, Nina is visiting from New York, as her parents have sent her away to stay with her California grandmother because the girl is too "boy crazy." Ellena is clearly attracted to Nina, as she ogles the body of the other girl in a tiny green bikini. Ellena wants to rub lotion on Nina, but limits her efforts primarily to her stomach. Why not her ass? Then she strips off her own swimsuit, and asks Nina to oil up her own nude body. It was all needlessly awkward and uncomfortable, as Nina has shown no indication of being in any ways a lesbian.

This overly-long, overly-convoluted intro continues with both girls then moving to the hot tub for some nervous giggling, with Ellena suddenly asking: "Have you ever hooked-up with a girl before?" Seriously, Team Skeet? You are stealing the same stupid-ass intro-lines perfected by GFF? Both girls begin kissing one another before then engaging in some predictable I-do-you-then-you-do-me lezzie-sex, including tribbing and 69ing.

set-up: D+, casting: B, sex: C
OVERALL: C

2) Samantha Hayes & Blake Eden
- Scene two opens with beautiful Samantha opening her hotel room door and inviting pretty blonde Blake inside. Apparently, Samantha is a sex-therapist, and Blake is having "issues" with her domineering husband. Samantha decides that a BDSM therapy-session is what is needed here. I am sorry, but that is an incredibly LAME intro-idea! These two will only be having sub/domme sex to help Blake deal with her domineering husband?

Samantha strips Blake down to her bra & panties, and binds her wrists. The camera-angles and audio are both poor. Samantha slaps the ass of the pretty blonde, even kissing it affectionately, except that we the viewers can barely see it happening. Who was running the camera? Who was directing? Whomever you are, you did a terrible job. Samantha was far too tentative to be playing the dominant role, in any case. Eventually they move the action to the bed so that they can take turns going down on one another, along with tribbing & 69-ing.

set-up: C+, casting: B+, sex: B-
OVERALL: B-

3) Sara Jay & Lola Fae
- Older woman Sara is supposedly tutoring pretty younger girl Lola. She is shown cleaning up in the kitchen where she discovers a cell-phone belonging to the younger girl, filled with racy pics. Sara decides to use this discovery to blackmail the pretty girl into surrendering her body to her. When Lola arrives home, Sara scolds her, saying she needs to be punished, and proceeds to spank her sexy little ass. One the negative side, Lola immediately says: "harder... harder" during the spanking - making it clear that this is a porn scene!

I really liked the older/younger contrast here, as well as the SIZE-CONTRAST between the two, along with the attempted sub/domme efforts, although Sara was not particularly well-suited for the dominant-role. I would have loved seeing Magdalene or Cindy Craves opposite Lola Fae instead! The sex that follows is needlessly porny, as Sara breaks out a dildo, along with loud yelling and silly-sounding porn-speak. Still, this was easily my FAVORITE scene on this DVD!

set-up: B, casting: B+, sex: B-
OVERALL: B

4) Sarah Vandella & Lilly Adams
- These are the two DVD cover-girls. Lilly has a boyfriend named Jake, and blonde Sarah is his mother. The mom is angry at Lilly for being such a slut, and decides to punish her with angry lezzie-sex. She pulls the dress off of the younger girl, licking her ass crack. I liked how Sarah remained in charge, but the writing for this scene was needlessly weak. Sarah sticks a butt-plug up the ass of the girl, along with dildo-usage, tribbing, & fingering.

set-up: D, casting: B+, sex: C
OVERALL: C

This could easily have been a MUCH BETTER video than it turned out to be, but the folks at Team Skeet opted not to make the effort. They would rather churn-out everyday porn, just like everybody else is doing. My grade for this one:

C+
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 12/31/2017 5:47 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:17 AM
Posts: 5,358

You still have not learned that imaginative and creative writers and directors go out of their way to avoid making the kind of trash you say is erotic. Sounds like you were expecting to see some more unconsensual and unwelcome fantasy sex that one women forces on another.

I am beginning to suspect you don't really care for women much and want to see them humiliated and unhappy. I still think you like a puppet show where everything is just playacting and let's pretend.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za7dAJtYXwo

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 12/31/2017 6:24 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 6:59 AM
Posts: 13,498
Skyhawk wrote: "You still have not learned that imaginative and creative writers and directors go out of their way to avoid making the kind of trash you say is erotic. Sounds like you were expecting to see some more unconsensual and unwelcome fantasy sex that one women forces on another."

You think so, Skyhawk? You don't believe that an erotic lesbian-themed video with a title like "Make Her Submit" should include anything but 100% consensual sex? I mean... I could be mistaken, but "Make Her Submit" sounds to me a little bit like somebody is making somebody else submit, does it not?

"I am beginning to suspect you don't really care for women much and want to see them humiliated and unhappy. I still think you like a puppet show where everything is just playacting and let's pretend."

Once again... let's look at that title... "Make Her Submit 03" - what does that mean to you, Skyhawk?

Do you not believe that titles actually MEAN anything? If you see a video titled: "Blondes with Blondes," but it's all about redheads with redheads, would you say that anybody who complains doesn't really care for women very much? Or, if a video is titled "Older/Younger Lesbians," but then includes ONLY older women together with other older women, would you say that anybody who doesn't like it "simply wants a puppet show where everything is play-acting?"

- If I ever become a director of girl/girl videos, Skyhawk, I will want ALL of my customers to be like YOU - enjoying everything, and complaining about nothing!
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 6:14 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 12/5/2018
Posts: 188
Quote: You still have not learned that imaginative and creative writers and directors go out of their way to avoid making the kind of trash you say is erotic. Sounds like you were expecting to see some more ...

Dude, do you read your own posts ???...a penguin in the Caribbean makes more sense than you.

It is like saying " You watch western movies, so you must hate indians ".

You also watch porn girls having sex on video and jerk off on it, just like me, just like Anon, and just like all of us, and that includes YOU as well.

You are no better than the rest of us.

You watch Julie Andrews during the day and g-g porn during the night. Shame on you !!!

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 6:19 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 5:17 AM
Posts: 5,358
I just keep wondering what is so hot about unconsensual/coerced/forced sex. I also keep wondering why you buy something based only on the title, sight unseen, and then complain about it. Haven't you wised up after all these years?
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 7:16 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 6:59 AM
Posts: 13,498
Runaway wrote (to Skyhawk): "It is like saying "You watch western movies, so you must hate indians".""

That's a pretty good analogy, Runaway - our friend Skyhawk sees no reason why western movies need to include violence between cowboys & indians that isn't 100% consensual on both sides - and he feels that those of us who purchase & watch western films are only exhibiting our apparently animosity towards native American peoples.

Skyhawk responds: "I just keep wondering what is so hot about unconsensual/coerced/forced sex."

So... you're problem isn't with ME so much as with companies like Team Skeet, which produce titles like "Make Her Submit?" I'm guessing that you don't believe that LLV should be selling any videos where the sex isn't always clearly 100% consensual? Is that it?

"I also keep wondering why you buy something based only on the title, sight unseen, and then complain about it. Haven't you wised up after all these years?"

I have a bad habit, Skyhawk, of thinking that what a video is TITLED is what it's actually going to be about - and sometimes it's NOT - but, thanks to things like Customer Reviews, people like you & me are free to tell others what they can expect to see in the videos that they purchase at this site!

- I applaud the folks at LLV for allowing a free expression of criticisms, applause, and other opinions to be openly discussed and debated here!
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 8:37 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 7:00 AM
Posts: 9,826
Julie Andrews as you mention, she missed her calling mmm ....As to Anons review of a " Team Skeet " product it enforces my belief that if you go outside the handful of top selling studios on this site it really is " Buyer Beware " territory. It's scary out there for the purveyor of true G/G erotica.

Attachments:

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

Please login
to view the image

 
04257EFB0000044D-3162214-image-a-7_1436965611275.jpg.cf.jpg7e13d9a837dbd0be43a376d1297562f1.jpg.cf.jpgCtrVWvyWEAA6wvD.jpg-small.cf.jpg 
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 10:11 AM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/24/2018
Posts: 5,044
By and large I would agree with Anon about this movie, except for one particular scene--the one between brown haired Samantha Hayes, and the pretty young blond, Blake Eden. Samantha may not be "dominating" enough for Anon's tastes, but I thought it was a near perfect bdsm scene, from where I sat.

Samantha has Blake standing naked in front of her, with Blake's hands tied and stretched out fully. But rather than, what I would call, the usual un-erotic stunts of bdsm--whipping with a silly cat'o'nine tails, or grabbing and pinching nipples until they're red and purple--Samantha circles Blake, leaning in whispering how beautiful and sexy she is, as her hands trail across Blake's slim naked body.

Then, for a long period of time, Samantha sits beneath Blake's out-stretched legs and worships Blake's pussy with her mouth and tongue. Samantha appears to give Blake several orgasms that way, before untying her and laying the weakened girl on the bed. Then, naked herself, Samantha lays herself across Blake's body and sensually grinds and kisses Blake for a considerable time. Samantha then trails her kisses down to Blake's pussy, and again begins licking Blake all over again. Blake appears to cum again, and maybe twice, before pushing Samantha's head away, indicating that she can't take it anymore. Going forward, the scene becomes more mutual after that.

This scene is so unlike any of the other scenes on this DVD, that it makes me wonder if it was choreographed by someone other than the usual director, or by the performers themselves. The person behind the camera is also somewhat of a novice, it appears, with the shot zooming in and out at times in a way that suggests either inexperience behind a camera, or a level of excitement that overrode professionalism. Either way, the camera work hardly spoiled the scene for me.


Regarding Skyhawk's comment, "I am beginning to suspect you don't really care for women much and want to see them humiliated and unhappy", I harbor the same suspicions. But at the end of the day, what people find arousing and "jerk-worthy" is their own business, and "live and let live" is my attitude. about that.

What I find puzzling and worth commenting on again, as others have over the years, is Anon's lack of interest in describing the sex itself, even when he rates it a "B+" (beyond his tiresome references to derriere appreciation). Anon will spend paragraphs describing why the 3 or 5 minute set-up was awful, or un-erotic, but spends zero space describing what he found in the sex to rate it a high score. Years ago on Lezlove forum, someone speculated that Anon must fast forward through the sex, in order to be able to list what is going on, but beyond that appears to have very little interest in the actual sex, since he spends so little time writing about it. I suspect that is a fairly accurate description.

But for roughly 99.9 % of porn viewers--whether of girl/girl, guy/girl, or whatever--it is the SEX itself that they are most interested in reading an opinion about! I hasten to add that this does not mean that these 99% care nothing about erotic set-ups--it means that they recognize that good set-up are there for the purpose of setting up outstanding and jerk-worthy sex!
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 3:05 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: Today @ 6:59 AM
Posts: 13,498
humble opinion wrote: "What I find puzzling and worth commenting on again, as others have over the years, is Anon's lack of interest in describing the sex itself, even when he rates it a "B+" (beyond his tiresome references to derriere appreciation)"

Okay, humble - that is a valid criticism which I will now address.

First of all, I think that erotic intros matter, whereas a LOT of others here (e.g. Skyhawk) believe them to be a complete waste of time. To me, if a company CARES about quality-erotic-intros, that's an excellent indication that they ALSO care about making quality-erotic-sex-scenes! A really good set-up can turn a so-so lezzie encounter into a MUCH HOTTER lezzie-encounter, while an incredibly LAME intro is a pretty good indication that the directors/writers don't care, and it's almost certainly going to reflect in the sex scene itself! So yes - if I'm totally bummed-out by watching a crappy intro, then I'm probably not going to enjoy the sex-scene, either.

Porny intros = porny sex-scenes. But there's MORE...

Back in 2011, Jewel Box Films and director Kay Brandt released "Cherry, Episode 1," and I wrote a LONG review of it, encompassing in great detail both the storyline AND an evaluation of the sex scenes. And then I RE-WROTE it as my finished review was TOO LONG - and after that I re-wrote it one more time, as my review was STILL too long! That same thing happened AGAIN in 2016, when my review of "Little Red - A Lesbian Fairy Tale" (Girlsway) was too long, and I actually had to include a "to be continued" in the review section! Since then, I've been forced to ABBREVIATE my reviews, and if that means less discussion of the sex scene, then so be it.

"Anon will spend paragraphs describing why the 3 or 5 minute set-up was awful, or un-erotic, but spends zero space describing what he found in the sex to rate it a high score."

This is true, humble, and I'm sorry about that. If I grade a sex-scene a "B" or higher, that's a pretty good indication that I enjoyed watching it. What I DISLIKE about too many sex-scenes are the OVERLY-PORNY encounters slapped together that inevitably end-up looking mechanical & formulaic - often with lots of loud moaning and crude porn-speak thrown in for good measure! "Fuck me with your big black cock... make me cum!" That's just garbage! I also hate scenes featuring INSTANT ANALINGUS - where they'll cast a beautiful girl with a gorgeous ass - but then the other woman completely ignores that beautiful behind so that she can instead concentrate fully on sticking her tongue up the other girl's anus!

"But for roughly 99.9 % of porn viewers--whether of girl/girl, guy/girl, or whatever--it is the SEX itself that they are most interested in reading an opinion about!"

And a TALENTED director will actually CARE about making it good - unfortunately, there are way too many UN-TALENTED writers & directors out there nowadays who are satisfied with simply churning-out everyday XXX-crap! And if an un-creative, un-imaginative writer/director doesn't take storylines seriously, then he-or-she almost CERTAINLY isn't going to take the SEX-SCENES all that seriously, either!

- I seriously want to ENJOY every girl/girl scene I watch - but the people behind the camera have to make somewhat of an EFFORT for that to happen - and too often they DON'T!
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 1/1/2018 5:04 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 12/12/2018
Posts: 5,769

"Girls in white dresses with blue satin sashes..."

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Showing page 1 of 2 - 18 messages found Next Page Last Page »
« Next Oldest :: Next Newest »


Design & Architecture © 2004 SMG Video, Inc | Terms & Conditions | All rights reserved.