LezloveVideo Group
Home
Login Member List
LezloveVideo Group   » General Discussions   » New Releases   » MDEC 48  
Welcome Guest ( Login )

MDEC 48
Author
Message
Posted 10/20/2017 6:04 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/11/2018
Posts: 366
Humble Opinion - Girlfriends films has, imo, still at this late date in their existence, the most consistently realistic girl/girl sex on film.

Or indeed the most unrealistic. Twenty year olds having sex with 40/50 year olds.
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/20/2017 8:15 PM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/24/2018
Posts: 5,044
Quote: Humble Opinion - Girlfriends films has, imo, still at this late date in their existence, the most consistently realistic girl/girl sex on film.Or indeed the most unrealistic. Twenty year olds having s...

I am talking about the sex itself, not how realistic, or fantasy based, the set-ups themselves might be.

And just to add a slight bit of fact to the proceedings here, the vast majority of MILFs in porn are NOT in their late 40s and early 50s. They are generally in their mid 30s to early 40s.



IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/20/2017 10:46 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/11/2018
Posts: 366
Humble Opinion - I am talking about the sex itself, not how realistic, or fantasy based, the set-ups themselves might be.

Er, set-ups weren't mentioned.

Humble Opinion - And just to add a slight bit of fact to the proceedings here, the vast majority of MILFs in porn are NOT in their late 40s and early 50s. They are generally in their mid 30s to early 40s.

And just to add a slight bit of fact to the proceedings here, he added pompously, ageing women are famously honest about their age. Porn is of course synonymous with honesty.

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/20/2017 10:47 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/11/2018
Posts: 366
IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/21/2017 6:51 AM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/24/2018
Posts: 5,044
Quote: Humble Opinion - I am talking about the sex itself, not how realistic, or fantasy based, the set-ups themselves might be.Er, set-ups weren't mentioned.Humble Opinion - And just to add a slight bit of ...

A typical reaction from so many around here on this forum.

Whenever porn stars, or some survey, or whatever, says something that contradicts your preconceptions, you simply shrug and say that they are lying--"I know what I believe, don't confuse me with the facts!"



And btw, it hasn't gone unnoticed, that when you guys, who hate breast implants, started your own thread recently, to rant about your bias, you got highly offended when I came on to offer a counter point of view. I was accused of being combative, and just not being a very good forum member. I didn't see myself that way, but I backed off on that thread.

Now roachman posts a brief comment praising a Mother Daughter movie, and you guys feel perfectly justified coming on this thread and making it into another diatribe about how unappealing breast implants are.

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/21/2017 7:30 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 12/12/2018
Posts: 5,769

I agree that GFF consistently has the most realistic sex.

I totally understand why many lezlovers are repelled by fake tits and regard it as a big deal.

For example, weren't we just praising realism in the sex? How then are we supposed to ignore falseness in a key attribute of the women having the sex? It also makes the women look whorish, which blows much of the fantasy away for many.

Why is that so hard to accept? No one will ever complain if studios start using girls who are 100% girl.

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/21/2017 10:30 AM
Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/24/2018
Posts: 5,044
Quote: I agree that GFF consistently has the most realistic sex. I totally understand why many lezlovers are repelled by fake tits and regard it as a big deal. For example, weren't we just praising realis...

Whenever you guys talk about breast enhancements, you soon enough start sounding self righteous, and gradually you just start sounding plain offensive--as if those of us who happen to like a number of the performers who have enhanced breasts should be ashamed of ourselves! Women with breast implants look "whorish"? The blanket negative stereotypes you keep using are insulting to women performers and to those of us who enjoy their work--and you wonder why I become so "combative".

What is probably the most annoying to me, is your presumption to be speaking for some great majority of porn viewers out there--when really all you are is about a half a dozen complainers who are talking to each other, in an echo chamber.

If you bothered to type in "most popular porn stars" into Google, you would find close to a dozen sites that track these things. Hell, one of these sites is an adjunct to NBC (CNBC). That's how popular and mainstream porn is becoming. Click on ANY ONE of these sites and look who they list. You will always find a mix of breast enhanced and natural porn performers. ALWAYS! Why? Because most porn viewers judge performers by how good they are at having sex on camera, not whether or not every part of their body is as God provided them at birth.

I don't begrudge anybody what they like. But when you rail against what you don't like, as if it is some sort of an affront against God and country, you go overboard, badly. And you start to say stuff, blanket statements like, "Women with breast implants look whorish" or "Women with breast implants have these disgusting scars that are a huge turn-off" or "When these performers are having sex, their boobs never act or look natural".

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/21/2017 11:01 AM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 12/11/2018
Posts: 944
Are we having fun yet?

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/21/2017 12:33 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 12/12/2018
Posts: 5,769
Quote: Are we having fun yet?

Yeah. Got popcorn?

~~~~~~~~~~

Humble, here's where you lose it, and lose the debate: By pretending that this surgical procedure and product are qualitatively no different than getting a new haircut or makeup. Or at most, no different than minor ink and metal. And then scorning those for whom it is a much bigger deal.

If you can't forthrightly acknowledge and engage all the genuine aesthetic downsides that have been described here many times, and honor that we are discussing such a primary sexual characteristic as a human female's teat - a wonder of the world sacred to all lezlovers - then you will always sound like a Martian on this subject.

Not to restart the many-fonted argument but I'll cite just one example: In motion or still, the beautiful and changing shapes of a girl's soft breasts under the influence of gravity.  GONE.

~~~~~~~~~~~

My apologies to the ladies who have gone down this path if this sounds mean, but on behalf of my selfish aesthetic preferences I always wish you hadn't whoever you are, and obviously I'm not the only one. And since in this space we are the customers...

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Posted 10/21/2017 12:48 PM


Supreme Being
Supreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Active: 11/11/2018
Posts: 366
Quote: Whenever you guys talk about breast enhancements, you soon enough start sounding self righteous, and gradually you just start sounding plain offensive--as if those of us who happen to like a number of...

In your customary rush to righteous indignation you have failed to read other members posts. There is only one member who has voiced his dislike for breast surgery, the rest is you trying to get on your high horse. Have fun up there.

IP Logged
This member is offline.
Showing page 2 of 3 - 26 messages found « First Page Prev Page Next Page Last Page »
« Next Oldest :: Next Newest »


Design & Architecture © 2004 SMG Video, Inc | Terms & Conditions | All rights reserved.