Wow, with those requirements, there must be very little Lesbian porn that you actually enjoy.
Canon, I have to dispute your statement that "My concept of pretty isn't demanding". Here is a list of what I recall, from present and past posts, what you say that you do not want to see:1. Breast enhancements2. Tattoos, particularly when they are near the "private parts"3. Heavy makeup4. Fake eyelashes5. "Older women" who are no longer slim and fitCorrect me if I am wrong on any of this list, but that is what I recall. Assuming that I am correct, I would say that your definition of what is "pretty" (or "arousing" may be a more accurate term, it seems to me) is a lot more "demanding" than mine. NONE of the things on that list are automatic "dis-qualifiers" for me.I am not saying that you are "wrong", Canon. There is no right or wrong in what you or I find arousing or pretty. What I am saying though, is that, just like with some others around here, when your list of what you DON'T find arousing or erotic becomes longer and longer, it becomes that much harder to find things that please you.
Except for numeros 2. ( Tatts ) I agree with Canon on every one of those points. I mean people's built in tastes are there tastes. You may not agree with them but that's the way it goes.I see box covers for new releases and if enhancements or other factors are highly present then I move on. In the cases of Ryan Keely Dana Vespoli and sadly Rebecca Linares breast jobs were so not needed. And now Luna states Dana Dearmond as well. Maybe I've not seen Ms. Dearmond lately but that's a no go for me. My three favorites from present to recent past Prinzzess Jo and Samantha Ryan all took off the clothes and the birthday suit was still organic. Tastes great, less filling I think is how John Madden put it.
"NONE of the things on that list are automatic "dis-qualifiers" for me."It's not clear to me, you do like those things or it is indifferent to you, as long as the sex is hot? "I would say that your definition of what is "pretty" (or "arousing" may be a more accurate term, it seems to me) is a lot more "demanding" than mine."So, what would be an automatic dis-qualifier for you regarding the looks of the models?I mean by not being "demading" is that I don't demand supermodel or mainstream actress looks type. I do like Abbywinters girls, for instance, and even here I've heard criticisms about their looks.
And I would say to you and Canon that you are missing out on so much great talent (not to mention watching a whole lot of great sex) with these tastes, that it strikes me as a shame. Dana Vespoli is the same sexy woman with the breast enhancements, that she was previous to them. The question that you guys would no doubt ask is, "Why did Dana have to get the breast implants?" Whereas, the question I would ask is, "What difference does it make?"Cie la vie. My main point is still the same: It seems to me that the more things folks cut out, automatically, as "unacceptable", the harder it becomes to enjoy what IS out there. That applies not just to Porn, but anything.
"It's not clear to me, you do like those things or it is indifferent to you, as long as the sex is hot?"A good question. I can't call myself "indifferent" to looks. But I would say that I am not rigid or inflexible in what I like to watch, as I think some other people are. For instance, generally speaking I might not find a woman with large, obviously fake breasts, like Deauxma, attractive to watch (at a strip club, she would probably NOT be my first choice for a lap dance). BUT, when I sit back and watch Deauxma in a scene--particularly in her "younger" days--I find that I can completely overlook my previous disclaimers and very much enjoy some of Deauxma's scenes. Deauxma is actually a very good example, I think, partly because she was around for so long, partly because she worked with so many different types of women (a great many of whom Deauxma met when she was a stripper on the Texas circuit), and partly because it was so obvious in watching Deauxma that she was "into" her partners and they were "into" her. Especially in Deauxma's early Girlfriends' days, there were a lot of different "types" that worked with Deauxma, that did not fit the Porn mold--even Girlfriends' more amateur porn mold. Zander Lin was very butch looking girl. Capri was a thin, small breasted, 30 something woman, who was, frankly fairly plain looking. Lily Redd, had a very similar body to Capri, but was considerably younger, and a little prettier. Lone Star Angel was a slim, small breasted girl with a Texas drawl and an attitude to match that drawl. Shayna Storm was a mid 30 something breast enhanced woman. Miranda was a mid 30 something Redhead, who was still pretty (although probably too much makeup for some) but had a "fuller" body now. Bibette Blanche was another breast enhanced 30 something woman, who was a bombshell brunette with attitude. And Torri Secret was a tall athletic girl, who looked like sports had been her passion before she discovered sex.I list all these women/girls because they mostly only worked with Deauxma, and were almost certainly all brought into Girlfriends by her. Each of them had, what I would describe as, some sensational sex scenes with Deauxma (as well as with each other, at times). None of these women/girls really fit any kind of mold of what a porn performer was supposed to look like, nor were they my idea of what I was looking to see on screen. But despite whatever reservations I might have had, I realized that these women could be very arousing to watch. I am not suggesting, btw, that every scene these women did, including Deauxma, were always or only "jaw dropping"--that would not be true. BUT, I WOULD say that if I had automatically dismissed watching these women, like so many of you guys around here seem to do, because these women/girls were not "my type", I would have missed out on some of my favorite girl/girl sex scenes. Bottom line: I think watching Deauxma in so many scenes--by no means my IDEAL of what an "attractive woman" is, either in real life or on screen--has taught me to be a lot more flexible in watching and appreciating Girl/Girl sex on screen.BTW, I understood, Canon, that by "demanding" you were not referring to super model looks or movie star looks. I have never felt that that was a criteria that you were using.