Seeing Dana I had to peek at the pix posted on another thread just to see she was playing the older. She is and I was good with that because not every scene needs a very large age gap. I looked no further and trusted she was the youngest.
Wait a minute! You mean that on a DVD labeled "older/younger" THREE of the "olders" are under 30 - and the fourth is the still-youthful Dana?
I call bullshit! That's false advertising, especially given the long history of real GFF o/y productions.
Not every o/y scene needs a big age gap - but MOST scenes on a supposedly o/y MUST have larger age differences!
You said it, Bear. We are seeing a formerly reliable brand self-destruct right before our eyes.
Specifically, I use a DVD rental service in which I select titles to place in a personal "queue." When the previous rental is returned they send the next available numbers in my queue.
The outfit has a good inventory, and choosing which DVDs to place in your queue is an enjoyable task that customers must perform.
My routine has been to periodically call up their newest GFF titles, and automatically select new DVDs in the series I like - Lesbian Seductions, Cheerleaders and MDEC. I don't even look at the casts, because I'm confident that age-appropriate women have been cast.
Until now. Henceforth, I'll start reviewing each LS and MDEC first to see if there is more false advertising involved.
That's how a brand dies. Drip, drip, drip, down the tubes.
They could overcome that real easy by playing these scenes "campy." Just enough over the top to represent a "wink" and "lets have sexy fun" to viewers. Versus "let's pretend we're real pervs."
Anon would be happy to explain why that is unlikely, but don't bother, we know.